Wednesday, October 21, 2009
1 comment:
- plusMETRO said...
-
I was just reading that article when I saw his comment. He makes a great point.
- October 23, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
This blog covers public transit, queer life and politics in Southern California, and anything else I feel like commenting on at the time.
I was just reading that article when I saw his comment. He makes a great point.
On the
"How about some attention to theSan Fernando Valley ...?
The Valley has 2/3 the population, yet gets 1/10th the public transit investments."
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2009/10/mayors-effort-to-fasttrack-westside-subway-faced-challenge.html#comments
Dave A. raises a good point.
I'm watching the machinations ofSan Gabriel Valley politicos who are persistently and consistently advocating for two Gold Line extensions.
There is no equivalent energy and advocacy happening in theSan Fernando Valley .
It's not that theSan Fernando Valley doesn't have worthy transit infrastructure projects. My top five SFV projects are:
1) a Sepulveda light rail project between Sylmar and LAX;Universal City and Warner Center .
2) upgrading the already at capacity Orange Line from busway to light rail;
3) Connecting Burbank Airport to Metro Rail;
4) An east-west line connecting the North Hollywood Station to the Gold Line through Burbank and Glendale;
5) A Ventura Blvd. modern streetcar between
These are achievable in the long-term if theSan Fernando Valley decides to get busy and start advocating for them.
There are certainly dynamic transit advocates in the Valley, such as Kymberleigh Richards. Please check out her website: http://www.transit-insider.org/ (While you are there, check out her "Transportation 101" link for a great presentation on how transportation is funded.)
BecauseCalifornia , Los Angeles County and Los Angeles City have legislatures that are too small and have enormous size legislative districts, many of the San Fernando Valley 's elected politicians also represent the Westside, where their power and influence is based and where most of the density is. Since I believe the downtown Regional Connector and the Westside Subway extension are the two most critical public transit infrastructure projects in Los Angeles County , I do not fault this.
However, what is missing in discussions about the future of
Could VICA (Valley Industry and Commerce Association) be the organization to get this SFV specific transit advocacy going? What about a SFV neighborhood council alliance? I'm interested in hearing your ideas.